**Federal Appeals Court Rejects Mark Meadows' Request to Transfer Georgia Election Case** Washington, D.C. - A federal appeals court has declined to reconsider former Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows' request to move his 2020 election-related case from Georgia to Washington, D.C. Meadows is facing charges in Georgia related to his alleged role in pressuring state officials to overturn the results of the presidential election. He previously sought to move the case out of the state, arguing that he could not receive a fair trial in Georgia due to the high-profile nature of the allegations. However, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Meadows' request, ruling that the Georgia court had jurisdiction over the case and that Meadows had not shown that he could not receive a fair trial in the state. This decision leaves Meadows' case set to proceed in Georgia. He is scheduled to appear in court for a hearing on November 14. The case has drawn significant attention due to its potential implications for Meadows and other Trump administration officials. It also raises questions about the future of the ongoing investigation into alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.
Cnn
**Federal Appeals Court Rejects Mark Meadows' Request to Transfer Georgia Election Case** Washington, D.C. - A federal appeals court has declined to reconsider former Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows' request to move his 2020 election-related case from Georgia to Washington, D.C. Meadows is facing charges in Georgia related to his alleged role in pressuring state officials to overturn the results of the presidential election. He previously sought to move the case out of the state, arguing that he could not receive a fair trial in Georgia due to the high-profile nature of the allegations. However, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Meadows' request, ruling that the Georgia court had jurisdiction over the case and that Meadows had not shown that he could not receive a fair trial in the state. This decision leaves Meadows' case set to proceed in Georgia. He is scheduled to appear in court for a hearing on November 14. The case has drawn significant attention due to its potential implications for Meadows and other Trump administration officials. It also raises questions about the future of the ongoing investigation into alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.
**Breaking News: Mark Meadows Cooperates with Special Counsel in Trump Investigation** Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has reportedly testified before a federal grand jury investigating the events leading up to and during the January 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection. This revelation comes amidst ongoing investigations by Special Counsel Jack Smith into the role of former President Donald Trump and his allies. Meadows, who served as Trump's final chief of staff, is a central figure in the investigation due to his proximity to the President during the period in question. Sources familiar with the matter indicate that Meadows' testimony could provide valuable insights into the White House's response to the election results and subsequent efforts to overturn them. The news of Meadows' cooperation follows his previous refusal to comply with a subpoena issued by the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack. His decision to testify before the grand jury suggests a shift in his stance or a belief that the stakes in the Special Counsel's investigation are higher. The ongoing investigation is expected to further scrutinize the actions of Trump and his associates in the lead-up to and during the Capitol riot. Meadows' testimony could potentially shed light on the extent of Trump's involvement, the motivations of those involved, and any potential efforts to obstruct justice. As the Special Counsel's probe continues, it remains to be seen whether Meadows' cooperation will ultimately lead to criminal charges against Trump or others. However, his testimony is undoubtedly a significant development in the investigation and could have far-reaching implications for American politics and the rule of law.
Nbc News
Jones of the Northern District of Georgia rejected an effort by Mark Meadows Mr Trumps former White House chief of staff to move his racketeering case from state. WEB A federal judge on Friday rejected former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows bid to move his Georgia criminal case to federal court a significant setback for Meadows and a. Meadows appeals ruling in bid to move Georgia election subversion case to federal court Former Trump White House chief of. A federal appeals court panel on Monday rejected an effort by Mark Meadows a White House chief of staff under former President Donald J Trump to move a Georgia election. WEB The prosecution of former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows for attempting to overturn the 2020 election will remain in Georgia state court a federal judge ruled Friday as..
**Federal Appeals Court Rejects Meadows' Attempt to Move Georgia Election Case** In a major ruling, a federal appeals court panel has rejected an effort by Mark Meadows, former White House chief of staff under President Donald Trump, to have his Georgia racketeering case moved to federal court. The decision came during a hearing on Monday, where Meadows' attorneys argued that the case should be tried in federal court due to the involvement of former President Trump and other high-ranking officials. However, the court rejected this argument, finding that the case falls within the jurisdiction of the Georgia state courts. The racketeering case against Meadows and several other Trump allies alleges that they conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The case was filed by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who has been investigating allegations of voter fraud and election interference. Meadows has denied all charges and has been cooperating with the investigation. However, his attempt to move the case to federal court was seen as a way to delay the proceedings and potentially avoid prosecution. The federal appeals court's decision is a significant setback for Meadows and his allies. It clears the way for the Georgia state courts to proceed with the racketeering case, which could have major implications for those involved.
Comments